Response Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Response - Movie Review Example Such books are preserved in the forbidden library, as they would question the authority of the church. One of the key ways through which Umberto Eco compares Brother Williams to Sherlock Holmes is through the assessment of the murders of the monks. In the contemporary setting, Sherlock Holmes was a brilliant detective who understood the inner workings of various aspects about the killers. Williams was able to think outside the box and as well, solve mysterious deaths that no one else would have solved.1 Using such an approach, although Brother William was not a detective by nature, his ability to see through crime in a way that most people would not makes him more like Sherlock Holmes. Bringing in the concept of the supernatural, such as demons, also makes this film more like Sherlock Holmes, as the detective was in a mysterious island, whose inner workings were unclear to humans, but were more of a supernatural nature. Reason is the key strategy of any investigation. Bearing in mind that most people do not have a clue on the inner workings of a murder case, because they have little, if any connection with the murderer, using reason is one of the ways through which such mysteries can be solved. Brother Williams was willing to reason and see beyond the trees, to view the forest. In short, he used the various simple details of a case to create a hypothetical bigger picture, which was much closer to the actual truth. The book is very educational, highly intuitive and a suspense filled packet of

I.R.S. Plan to Uncover Companies Tax Strategies Essay

I.R.S. Plan to Uncover Companies Tax Strategies - Essay Example t September the call for the regulations regarding overhauling the ruling and making those practices transparent started and those regulations became effective for the 2010 tax year effective December 15. The new law affects corporations (foreign and domestic) and insurance companies with assets in excess of $500 million, gradually reduced to $10 million by 2014. Kocieniewski seems to side with the corporations, but there are at least two valid reasons why the Government is justified in ending this money pit. (Kocieniewski) The one major argument the IRS uses to support the new â€Å"transparency† ruling is that its tax agents spend far too much time researching these claims as to their legitimacy and the agents’ time could be better spent going after tax cheats and proprietary information would not be shared. Of course the companies and their accounting agencies cried foul, counteracting that agents already â€Å"find an issue and try to extract some kind of payment for its nuisance value†. (Lear) The IRS’s position is a valid one. Let the average taxpayer try that one. If one owed X dollars in taxes for a household of his wife and him and yet paid taxes on four exemptions because his brother and sister-in-law stayed in the guest room for a few weeks, setting the rest in an account, the man would quickly be in jail! True corporations get tax advantages people don’t, on the premise of creating more jobs. However, if their deductions are legal they will find out soon enough, although most already know those questionable deductions would fail an audit. Their major problems are these huge reserves for possible taxes they used to pocket after the time limits. Another major problem is that during these austere times and Federal budget cuts, Congress is pressuring the tax people to collect more revenue and with more and more US jobs going overseas the bolstering the economy and creating jobs arguments of the major companies is flimsy at best. There is